7 Phytochemical and Pharmacological Accounts of Some Reviewed Plants With Antidiabetic Potential
Open up admission peer-reviewed affiliate
Phytochemical Composition, Antioxidant Potential, and Medicinal Significance of Ficus
Submitted: January 14th, 2019 Reviewed: Apr 26th, 2019 Published: Nov 27th, 2019
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.86562
From the Edited Volume
Modern Fruit Industry
Edited by Ibrahim Kahramanoglu, Nesibe Ebru Kafkas, Ayzin Küden and Songül Çömlekçioğlu
IntechOpen Downloads
828
Full Chapter Downloads on intechopen.com
Abstract
Ficus, a genus of plant family Moraceae, includes about 850 species. Most of the species of Ficus are used as a source of diet for humans. The roots, aeriform roots, stem, bawl, leaves, latex, fruit, and pulp of the Ficus plants are medicinally important due to the presence of a variety of bioactive phytochemical compounds, such as polyphenols, phenolic acids, triterpenoids, flavonoids, flavonols, anthocyanins, carotenoids, glycosides, polysaccharides, reducing compounds, and vitamins Thou, E, and C. Nearly of these phytochemical compounds possess potent antioxidant potential in terms of metal chelating, metal reducing, lipid reducing, and free radical scavenging capacities, which may be helpful in reducing the oxidative stress in the biological systems. On account of their high phytochemical content and strong antioxidant potential, these plants prove several biological activities including antimicrobial, antidiabetic, anti-obesity, hepatoprotective, cardioprotective, and renal-protective, and anticancer activities. These plants have been found to be constructive in the treatment of diabetes, stomachache, piles, skin diseases, inflammation, and cancer.
Keywords
- Moraceae
- Ficus
- Phytochemical limerick
- Antioxidant potential
- Medicinal significance
*Accost all correspondence to: haqnawaz@bzu.edu.pk
1. Introduction
The genus
Domain | Eukaryota |
Kingdom | Plantae |
Subkingdom | Viridaeplantae |
Phylum | Tracheophyta |
Subphylum | Euphyllopsidia |
Infra phylum | Radiatopses |
Partition | Magnoliophyte |
Course | Magnoliopsida |
Bracket | Dilleniidae |
Superorder | Urticaneae |
Lodge | Urticales |
Family | |
Genus | |
Advertisement
2. Biochemical and nutritional composition
Since ancient times,
Ad
3. Phytochemicals of Ficus species
Phytochemicals are the bioactive components of plants having great importance in pharmaceutical and medicinal field. The genus
Ficus species | Plant parts | Extracting solvent | Class | Phytochemical components | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barks | Water, methanol, organic solvents, helium | Polysterols | Bergapten, bergaptol, lanosterol, β-sitosterol, stigmasterol, β-sitosterol-d-glucoside (Phytosterolin) | [24, 25] |
Flavonoids | Leucocyanidin-3-O-β-glucopyranosid, leucopelargonidin-3-O-β-d-glucopyranoside, leucopelargonidin-3-O-α-l-rhamnopyranoside, lupeol, cetyl behenate, acetate and α-amyrin acetate | ||||
Polyphenols | Tannin, wax, saponin, leucoanthocyanidin, leucoanthocyanin | ||||
Fruit | Water | Flavonols | Kaempferol, quercetin, and myricetin | [26, 27] | |
Miscellaneous compounds | Undecane, tridecane, tetradecane, (due east)-β-ocimene β-bourbonene, β-caryophyllene, α-trans bergamotene, α-thujene, α-pinene, β-pinene, α-terpinene, limonene, dendrolasine, dendrolasine α-ylangene, α-copaene, aromadendrene, α-humulene, alloaromadendrene, germacrene, bicycle-germacrene, γ-cadinene and δ-cadinene | ||||
Leaves | Ethanol | Polyphenols | Eugenol, 2-phenylethyl alcohol, and benzyl booze, hexenol, northward-hexanol, phytol, benzyl alcohol | [28] | |
Miscellaneous compounds | Phenol, salicylaldehyde, phenylacetaldehyde, allyl caproate, linalool, due north-nonanal, adipoin, methylcyclopentane, 2-dione, itaconic anhydride, ii-phenylethyl alcohol, benzeneacetonitrile, nonadienal, nonen-one-ol, nonadienol, linalool oxide, catechol, coumaran, cinnamyl booze, vinylguaiacol, hexenyl tiglate, eugenol, hexenyl hexenoate, β-ionone, dihydroactinidiolide, α-copaene, hexenyl benzoate, eudesmol, eudesmol, epi-α-cadinol, β-eudesmol, α-eudesmol, α-cadinol, pentadecanal, palmitic acid and itaconic anhydride, 3-methylcyclopentane-one, ii-dione | ||||
| Leaves and fruits | Ether, chloroform and ethanol | Flavonols | Kaempferol, quercetin, myricetin | [29] |
Phenolic acids | Betulinic acid, lupeol | ||||
Sterols | Stigmasterol, bergapten, scopoletin, β-sitosterol-3-O-β-d-glucopyranoside | ||||
| Whole plant | North-butanol, ethanol and methanol | Flavonoids | Quercetin, quercetin iii-O-l-rhamnopyranosyl (one-6)-β-d-glucopyranoside, quercetin iii-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (isoquercitrin), quercetin three,vii-O-α-l-dirhamnoside, quercetin, 3-O-β-d-galactopyranosyl(i-6)-glucopyranoside | [30] |
Sterol | β-Sitosterol-iii-β-d-glucopyranoside | ||||
Phenolic acids | Gallic acid | ||||
| Dried fruit | Water | Flavonoids | Alkaloids, flavonoids, coumarins, saponins, rennin, caoutchouc, resin, albumin, cerin, sugar and terpenes | [31] |
Latex | Water | Enzymes | Proteolytic enzymes, diastase, esterase, lipase, catalase, and peroxidase | [32] | |
Phenolic acids | Malic acrid | ||||
Leaves | Water | Coumarins | Psoralen and bergapten | [33] | |
Flavonoids | Rutin, quercetin, and luteolin | ||||
Phenolic acids | Ferulic acid | ||||
Phytosterols | Taraxasterol, psoralen and bergapten (five-methoxypsoralen) | ||||
Pulp | Water | Phenolic acids | Chlorgenic acid | ||
Peel | Water | Coumarins and sterol | Quercitin-3-O-rutinoside, psoralen | ||
| Aeriform roots | Water and methanol | Polyphenols | Saponins, tannins, glucoside and flavonoids | [fourteen] |
Sterol | β-Sitosterol-α-d-glucose and meso-inositol | ||||
| Stalk bark | Water | Polyphenols | Alkaloids, balsams, carbohydrates, flavonoids, gratis anthraquinones, tannins, glycosides, terpenes, resins, sterols and saponins, glycosides | [34] |
Leaves | Water | Volatile compounds | Carvacrol, α-caryophyllene, caryophyllene oxide, linalool, iii-tetradecanone, geranylacetone, three,7,eleven-trimethyl-three-hydroxy-6;x-dodecadiene-i-yl acetate, hexahydrofarnesyl acetone, α-caryophyllene, 2-methyl-iii-hexyne and scytalone | [35] | |
| Roots | Water | Phenolic acids | Betulinic acid and ursolic acid | [36] |
Anthocyanins | Trihydroxy-stilbene-3, 5-O-β-d-diglucopyranoside, euphol-3-ocinnamate, lupeol, taraxar-14-ene | ||||
| Aerial roots | Triterpenoids | Friedelin, lupeol, oleanolic acid, ursolic acids | [37] | |
Leaves | Flavoinoids | Catechin, epicatechin and isovitexin | |||
| Leaves | Methanol | Polyphenols | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acrid-dibutyl ester, phenol, 4-(2aminopropyl), butyrolactone | [38] |
Aerial parts | Ethanol | Flavonols | Luteolin, afzelechin, catechin, vitexin, β-sitosterol acetate, β-amyrin acetate, moretenone, β-amyrin | [39] | |
Sterols | β-Sitosterol, friedelenol | ||||
| Stem bawl | H2o | Anthocyanins | Cetyl behenate, lupeol, α-amyrin acetate | [40] |
Leaves and bawl | Water | Sterols | β-Sitosterol and a new tetracyclic tritepene-glaunol acetate | ||
| Fresh leaves and stalk | Methanol | Anthocyanins | Amyrin acetate, α-amyrin acetate, lupeol, β-amyrin, α-amyrin, rhoiptelenol, 3α-hydroxyisohop-22(29)-en-24-oic acrid, lupenyl acetate | [41] |
Phenolic acids | Ursolic acid, betulinic acid | ||||
| Stem bark | Water | Terpenes | Pentacyclic triterpenes 8,26-cyclo-urs-21-en3β, 20β-diol and 3β-acetoxy-viii, 26-cyclo-ursan-20β-ol and also iii-friedelanone | [42] |
Phenolic acids | Oleanolic acid, betulinic acid | ||||
Anthocyanins | Lupeol acetate, α and β amyrine, three,v,7,4′-tetra hydroxyl flavones | ||||
| Leaves | Hot and cold water | Flavonols | Triterpene, conrauidienol, and dihydroflavonol, conrauiflavonol, 3,4',v-trihydroxy-vi'',6''-dimethylpyrano[two,3-thousand]flavone | [43, 44, 45] |
Anthocyanin | β-amyrin acetate, 6β-hydroxystigmasta-4,22-dien-iii-1, 8-prenylapigenin | ||||
Phenolic acid | Betulinic acid, ursolic acrid | ||||
Flavonoids | Luteolin, catechin, epigallocatechin, orientin | ||||
Sterol | β-Sitosterol glucoside | ||||
| Whole found | H2o | Phenolic acid | Gallic acrid | [46] |
Anthocyanin | 3, β-hydroksilup-20(29)-en, (lupeol) | ||||
Polyphenols | Carbohydrates, glycosides, saponins, resins, fatty, flavonoids, tannins, and phenolic compounds. Alkaloids and steroid were absent | [47] |
| Plant parts | ES | TPC | TFC | TF | AAC | TAC | TSC | TA | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roots | Ethanol | seventy mg/one thousand excerpt | 5 mg QE/g extract | three mg QE/g extract | [48] | ||||
| Lurid | Water | 0.49–0.88 mg GAE/g | [49] | ||||||
| Leaves | Hexane | six.6–9.5 M/TE | [50] | ||||||
| Dried leaves | Hexane | 17.44 mg/g | iii.87 mg/g | [51] | |||||
| Dried leaves | Methanol | 7.83 mg/thousand | 1.05 mg/g | [51] | |||||
| Fruit | Ethanol | 28.6–211.19 mg GAE/100 g FW, eleven.9 mg/m of DM | 2.75 μg CE/mg sample | 9.six% | 0.59% | 0.0–298.6 μg cy-3-rutinoside/k FW | [52, 53] | ||
| Fruit | Hexane | 259.ii mg GAE/g | [54] | ||||||
Methanol | 245.2 mg GAE/chiliad | |||||||||
Chloroform | 159.2 mg GAE/g | |||||||||
| Pulp | Methanol | 28–30 mg/100 thousand extract | [55] |
Ad
4. Antioxidant composition
Antioxidants are the substances which can scavenge costless radicals and reduce the oxidative stress in the living and nonliving systems. The antioxidants possess electron donating ability and inhibit the complimentary radical-mediated oxidative reactions by diverse mechanisms, such as, hydrogen donation, metallic chelation, metal and lipid reduction, inhibition of lipid peroxidation and free radical inhibition [56, 57, 58, 59, lx]. Free radicals are the reactive oxygen and nitrogen species which are produced during diverse biochemical reactions peculiarly redox reactions. If not controlled properly, these free radicals may initiate the chain reactions in the biomolecules particularly the lipids and protein, cause the oxidative stress, and finally atomic number 82 to the oxidative damage to the cell organelles, cells and tissues [24]. The oxidative harm to the cells and tissues may further lead to various health problems including cardiovascular, neurological, hepatic, and musculoskeletal abnormalities and aging. In nonliving system, the free radicals cause oxidative stress and rancidity in the food stuff for human [25]. The naturally occurring antioxidant compounds have been proved to be effective in preventing the oxidative damage to the living and nonliving systems [26]. These substances are either synthesized endogenously or taken from exogenous natural sources such as plants. The naturally occurring antioxidants include some enzymes such as glutathione peroxidase, catalase, superoxide dismutase and some not-enzymatic phytochemicals compounds including phenolic acids, polyphenols, flavonoids, anthocyanins, ascorbic acrid, tocopherols, and β-carotenes [27, 28]. Some synthetic antioxidant compounds have been besides reported to exist constructive against complimentary radical-induced oxidative damage [29].
The antioxidant profile of various parts of
| Part | ES | TEAC* | FRAC | DPPH-RSC | ABT-RSC | ILP | LRA | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stem | Methanol | 16.ii% | 8615.3 mmol/g DM | [61] | ||||
Bark | Ethanol | 79% | 10884.6 μmol/g DM | ||||||
Roots | Water | 0.five–0.26 mg/ml | |||||||
| Leaves | H2o | 0.13–0.66 mg/ml | IC50: 0.34 mg/ml | IC50: 0.23 mg/ml | 83.xxx% | [51] | ||
| Leaves | Methanol | 0.07–0.26 mg/ml | IC50: 0.69 mg/ml | IC50: 0.97 mg/ml | [51] | |||
| Mouse liver | Normal saline | 4.20–v.31 μmol TE/thousand ep | ECfifty: 313.3 μg/ml | [55, 62] | ||||
Craven liver | Normal saline | EC50: 333.8 μg/ml | |||||||
| Fruit | Methanol | 0.08–0.33 mg/ml | IC50: 0.95 mg/ml | ICfifty: 0.35 mg/ml | 41–83% | [51] | ||
| Fruit | Methanol | 77.6 mg AC/100 g FW | 104.9 mg CE/100 g FW | 577.09 mg BH/100 g FW | [63, 64] | |||
Ethanol | 146.67 mg Air-conditioning/100 chiliad FW | 146.nine mg CE/100 g FW | 729.45 mg BH/100 g F W | ||||||
| Roots | Acetone | 0.ane–0.45 mg/ml | ICfifty: 0.29 mg/ml | ICfifty: 0.25 mg/ml | 41–83% | [51] | ||
| Bark | H2o | 0.06–0.32 mg/ml | IC50: 1.03 mg/ml | IC50: 0.48 mg/ml | [51] | |||
Leaves | Methanol | SC50 (74.00 μg/ml) | [65] | ||||||
| Leaves | Acetone | 0.04–0.22 mg/ml | IC50: ii.54 mg/ml | IC50: 0.86 mg/ml | 41.40% | [51] | ||
| Aerial roots | Methanol | 71% | 6096.ane μmol/g DM | [61, 66] | ||||
Acetone, Water | 0.1–1.0 mg/ml | 96.07% | 6182.7 μmol/g DM | ||||||
| Stalk bark | Methanol | 84.088% | [67] | |||||
Stem bawl | Chloroform | 83.864% | |||||||
Stem bawl | Hexane | 42% | |||||||
| Leaves | Acetone | 2.32%, 4.73 mg GAE/g DW | [68] | |||||
| Leaves | Hexane, water | 14.04%, 23.fifty acetate/k DW | seven.9–16.1 mmol/kg FW | 11.42 mmol/100 g DW | 6.48 mmol/100 g DW | [52, 69, 70] | ||
| Fruit | Dichloromethane | IC50: 0.02 mg/ml | [71] | |||||
Due north hexane | IC50: 1.64 mg/ml | ||||||||
| Root, Bawl | H2o | ICl: 1.62–47.50 μg/ml | IC50: 0.91–6.48 μg/ml | 86.thirteen% | [72] | |||
| Leaves | Acetone | 2.65%, viii.23 mg GAE/g DW | [68] | |||||
| Leaves | Ethanol | SCfifty > 0.4 mmol/100 g DW | [73] | |||||
| Bark | Water | 489.iv mg GAE/grand DW | 104.57 μmol FSE/mg DE | 56.fifty QE/mg DE | [74] | |||
Unripe fruit | 62.34 GAE/g DW | 19.61 μmol FSE/mg DW | 7.iii QE/mg DE | ||||||
| Leaves | Acetone | 2.threescore%, 9.80 mg GAE/g DW | [68] | |||||
| Fruit | Methanol | 55.9% | 93.91% | [75] | ||||
| Fruit | Water | 5.89 mg GAE/g DW | ane.82 mmol FSE/thousand DE | IC50 = 111.20 μg/ml | 1.01–1.04 mmol TE/g DE | [76] | ||
| Leaves | Acetone | ii.threescore%, nineteen.24 mg GAE/grand DW | [68] | |||||
| Bawl | Ethyl acetate | 436 mg GAE/k DW | 63.2 μg/ml | one.ii μg/ml | 4.83 μg/ml | [71] | ||
Leaves | Ethanol | 86.thirteen% | |||||||
Hexane | 86.76% | ||||||||
| Leaves | Ethanol | 90.70% | [71] | |||||
Hexane | 88.97% | ||||||||
| Leaves | Ethanol | 90.13% | [71] | |||||
Hexane | 94.38% | ||||||||
| Fruit | Water organic solvents | 17.9 grand GAE/one thousand DW | [22] | |||||
| Leaves | Ethanol | SC50 (viii.27, 12.14 μg/ml) | 80.41% | [65] | ||||
Methanol | SCfifty (38.37 mg/ml) | [65] | |||||||
| Dried leaves | Methanol | SC50 (61.67 μg/ml) | [65] | |||||
| Pulp | Methanol | SC50 (60.22 μg/ml) | [65] | |||||
| Leaves | Methanol | SC50 (81.62 μg/ml) | [65] | |||||
| Leaves | Acetone | three.70%, 56.85 mg GAE/g DW | [68] | |||||
| Leaves | Acetone | 2.35%, 4.75 mg GAE/k DW | [68] | |||||
| Leaves | Acetone | 3.15%, 8.04 mg GAE/m DW | [68] | |||||
| Leaves | Acetone | 2.45%,5.forty mg GAE/thousand DW | [68] | |||||
| Leaves | Acetone, hexane and methanol | 2.60%, 12.33 mg GAE/g DW | SC50 (79.fifty μg/ml) | 82.35% | [65, 68] | |||
| Leaves | Acetone | 2.40%, four.64 mg GAE/g DW | [68] | |||||
| Leaves | Ethanol | 86.forty% | [71] |
Advertisement
5. Biological activities
On the basis of their phytochemical composition and antioxidant profile,
| Institute part | Extracting solvent | Action | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole | Ethanol | Anticancer activity by reduction of lipid peroxidation, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase and xanthine oxidase and by generation of hydrogen peroxide | [77] |
Bark | Methanol | Hepatoprotective activity by reducing the activities of ALT, AST and ALP | [four] | |
Whole | Ethanol | Hypoglycemic activity by decreasing blood glucose level | [4] | |
| Fruit | Water | Antitumor activity due to blockage of calcium uptake in pituitary cells | [13] |
Whole | H2o | Antioxidant and antidiabetic activeness with lowering the superoxide dismutase exaggerated activity | [78] | |
Whole | Methanol | Anthelmintic activeness with 100% effectiveness | [79] | |
Whole | Water | Antimicrobial activity with inhibition zone against | [four] | |
Bawl | Methanol | Anti-parasitic outcome with 100% lethality for | [79] | |
| Bark | Water | Antioxidant and hypolipidemic activeness by reduction in lipid peroxidation, cholesterol level and triacylglycerol | [lxxx] |
Fruit | Water | Anticancer and antibacterial activity but no antifungal activeness | [81] | |
Roots | Various polarity solvents | Anti-inflammatory and analgesic action | [82] | |
Whole | Methanol | Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity due to inhibition of malanodialdehyde formation | [82] | |
| Roots | Methanol | Antiulcerogenic activeness with cytoprotective nature of constituents | [83] |
| Leafs | Methanol | Mucoprotective activity and gastric antisecretory | [23] |
| Leaves | Methanol | Hepatoprotective activity with subtract in lipid peroxides with cytochrome p450 complex inhibition | |
| Fruit | Ethanol | Gastroprotective result | [84] |
Fruit | Phenol | Anti ulcerogenic, antimutagenic and anti cancerogenic compounds | [84] | |
| Whole | Water | Antiviral activity due to inhibition of reverse transcriptase activity of HIV-ane | [85] |
Leaves | Water | Antimalarial activity confronting | [86] | |
| Leaves | H2o, ethanol | Meaning antibacterial activity | [35] |
Leaves | Water | Actuate against standard human pathogenic yeasts strains | [87] | |
| Leaves | Diethyl ether | Anti-pneumonia action | [88] |
| Leaves | Water | Significant antibacterial activity but no antifungal activeness | [35] |
| Leaves and fruits | Alcohol | Antifungal and antibacterial activities | [89] |
| Stem bark | Water | Antimicrobial activities confronting | [65] |
| Foliage | H2o | Significant antimicrobial upshot | [xc] |
| Leaves | Acetone | Act as potent inhibitor of α-amylase | [68] |
Advertisement
6. Medicinal importance
Almost all of the
Advertisement
7. Conclusion
All species of
Advertisement
Conflict of interest
The authors accept no conflict of interest regarding this chapter.
References
- 1.
Awad NE et al. Hypolipidaemic and antioxidant activities of Ficus microcarpa (50.) in hypercholesterolemic rats. Natural Product Research. 2011;25 (12):1202-1207 - 2.
Al-Aboudi A, Afifi FU. Plants used for the handling of diabetes in Jordan: A review of scientific evidence. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2011; 49 (3):221-239 - iii.
Sirisha N et al. Antioxidant properties of Ficus species—A review. International Journal of PharmTech Research. 2010;two (4):2174-2182 - 4.
Joseph B, Raj SJ. Phytopharmacological and phytochemical properties of 3 Ficus species—An overview. International Periodical of Pharma and Bio Sciences. 2010;ane (4):246-253 - 5.
Khedr AI et al. Panduramides A-D, new ceramides from Ficus pandurata fruits. Phytochemistry Letters. 2018;23 :100-105 - 6.
Shanahan Thousand et al. Fig-eating by vertebrate frugivores: A global review. Biological Reviews. 2001; 76 (4):529-572 - 7.
Wilson D, Wilson A. Figs as a global spiritual and cloth resource for humans. Human Ecology. 2013; 41 (3):459-464 - viii.
Prasad P et al. Doc-historical study of "aśvattha" (sacred fig tree). Bulletin of the Indian Institute of History of Medicine (Hyderabad). 2006; 36 (1):1-20 - nine.
Ghimire G, Bastakoti RR. Ethnomedicinal knowledge and healthcare practices among the Tharus of Nawalparasi district in Cardinal Nepal. Forest Ecology and Direction. 2009; 257 (10):2066-2072 - x.
Shah N. Herbal folk medicines in northern India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 1982; 6 (iii):293-301 - 11.
Singh A, Raghubanshi A, Singh J. Medical ethnobotany of the tribals of Sonaghati of Sonbhadra district, Uttar Pradesh, Republic of india. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2002; 81 (ane):31-41 - 12.
Gilani AH et al. Ethnopharmacological studies on antispasmodic and antiplatelet activities of Ficus carica . Periodical of Ethnopharmacology. 2008;119 (ane):one-v - thirteen.
Mousa O et al. Bioactivity of certain Egyptian Ficus species. Planta Medica. 1992;58 (S1):632-633 - fourteen.
Aswar K et al. Anthelmintic activity of Ficus benghalensis . International Journal of Green Pharmacy (IJGP). 2008;2 (3):170-172 - xv.
Shukla R et al. Antioxidant effect of aqueous excerpt of the bark of Ficus benghalensis in hypercholesterolaemic rabbits. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2004;92 (1):47-51 - 16.
Solomon A et al. Antioxidant activities and anthocyanin content of fresh fruits of common fig ( Ficus carica Fifty.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2006;54 (20):7717-7723 - 17.
Lansky EP et al. Ficus spp. (fig): Ethnobotany and potential every bit anticancer and anti-inflammatory agents. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2008;119 (2):195-213 - 18.
Trivedi C, Shinde Due south, Sharma R. Preliminary phytochemical and pharmacological studies on Ficus racemosa (Gular). The Indian Journal of Medical Inquiry. 1969;57 (half dozen):1070-1074 - nineteen.
Deepa P et al. A part of Ficus species in the management of diabetes mellitus: A review. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2018;215 :210-232 - 20.
You T, Nicklas BJ. Chronic inflammation: Role of adipose tissue and modulation by weight loss. Current Diabetes Reviews. 2006; 2 (1):29-37 - 21.
Mohan GK et al. Hepatoprotective activity of Ficus carica Linn leaf extract against carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2007;15 (three):162-166 - 22.
Ao C et al. Evaluation of antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Ficus microcarpa 50. fil. extract. Nutrient Command. 2008;xix (x):940-948 - 23.
Gregory Grand et al. Anti-ulcer (ulcer-preventive) action of Ficus arnottiana Miq. (Moraceae ) leafage methanolic excerpt. American Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2009;4 (3):89-93 - 24.
Al-Snafi AE. Pharmacology of Ficus religiosa -a review. IOSR Journal of Pharmacy. 2017;vii (3):49-lx - 25.
Rajiv P, Sivaraj R. Screening for phytochemicals and antimicrobial activeness of aqueous excerpt of Ficus religiosa Linn. International Periodical of Chemist's shop and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2012;4 (v):207-209 - 26.
Grison-Pigé Fifty et al. Fig volatile compounds—A first comparative study. Phytochemistry. 2002; 61 (ane):61-71 - 27.
Makhija IK, Sharma IP, Khamar D. Phytochemistry and pharmacological properties of Ficus religiosa : An overview. Annals of Biological Research. 2010;one (four):171-180 - 28.
Poudel A, Satyal P, Setzer WN. Composition and bioactivities of the leaf essential oil of Ficus religiosa Linn. American Journal of Essential Oils and Natural Products. 2015;2 (3):xvi-17 - 29.
El-Fishawy A, Zayed R, Afifi S. Phytochemical and pharmacological studies of Ficus auriculata Lour. Journal of Natural Products. 2011;iv :184-195 - xxx.
Mohamed AE-HH et al. Chemical constituents and biological activities of Artemisia herba-alba . Records of Natural Products. 2010;4 :i - 31.
Vaya J, Mahmood South. Flavonoid content in foliage extracts of the fig ( Ficus carica L.), carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) and pistachio (Pistacia lentiscus Fifty.). BioFactors. 2006;28 (3-4):169-175 - 32.
Aref HL et al. In vitro antimicrobial activeness of four Ficus carica latex fractions confronting resistant man pathogens (antimicrobial activity ofFicus carica latex). Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2010;23 (1):53-58 - 33.
Jeong G-R, Kim H-Y, Cha J-D. Antimicrobial activeness of methanol extract from Ficus carica leaves confronting oral bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology and Virology. 2009;39 (ii):97-102 - 34.
Oyeleke S, Dauda B, Boye O. Antibacterial action of Ficus capensis . African Journal of Biotechnology. 2008;7 (x):1414-1417 - 35.
Salem MZ et al. Antimicrobial activities and phytochemical limerick of extracts of Ficus species: An over view. African Periodical of Microbiology Inquiry. 2013;7 (33):4207-4219 - 36.
Kuete V et al. Antimicrobial activities of the methanol extract, fractions and compounds from Ficus polita Vahl. (Moraceae ). BMC Complementary and Culling Medicine. 2011;11 (one):half dozen - 37.
Chiang Y-M, Kuo Y-H. Novel triterpenoids from the aeriform roots of Ficus microcarpa . The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2002;67 (22):656-7661 - 38.
Aly HI et al. The value-added uses of Ficus retusa andDalbergia sissoo grown in Egypt: GC/MS analysis of extracts. Periodical of Wood Products & Industries. 2013;2 (3):34-41 - 39.
Sarg TM et al. Ii new polyphenolic compounds from Ficus retusa Fifty. variegata and the biological activity of the different establish extracts. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy. 2011;3 (vii):89-100 - xl.
Mubashir Due south, Shah WA. Phytochemical and pharmacological review profile of Adiantum venustum . International Journal of PharmTech Research. 2011;iii :827-830 - 41.
Kitajima J, Arai M, Tanaka Y. Triterpenoid constituents of Ficus thunbergii . Chemical & Pharmaceutical Message. 1994;42 (3):608-610 - 42.
Poumale HM et al. Pentacyclic triterpenes and other constituents from Ficus cordata (Moraceae ). Zeitschrift fuer Naturforschung B. 2008;63 (11):1335-1338 - 43.
Abdel-Hameed Eastward-SS et al. Phytochemicals, nutritionals and antioxidant backdrop of ii prickly pear cactus cultivars ( Opuntia ficus-indica Mill.) growing in Taif, KSA. Food Chemistry. 2014;160 :31-38 - 44.
Kengap RT et al. Isoprenoids and flavonoids with antimicrobial activity from Ficus conraui Warburg (Moraceae ). Helvetica Chimica Acta. 2011;94 (12):2231-2238 - 45.
Omar MH, Mullen W, Crozier A. Identification of proanthocyanidin dimers and trimers, flavone C-glycosides, and antioxidants in Ficus deltoidea , a Malaysian herbal tea. Journal of Agricultural and Nutrient Chemistry. 2011;59 (iv):1363-1369 - 46.
Hakiman One thousand et al. Total antioxidant, polyphenol, phenolic acrid, and flavonoid content in Ficus deltoidea varieties. Journal of Medicinal Institute Enquiry. 2012;half dozen (33):4776-4784 - 47.
Bunawan H et al. Ficus deltoidea Jack: A review on its phytochemical and pharmacological importance. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2014;2014 :1-nine - 48.
Kumari K, Sharma A, Jagannadham M. Religiosin B, a milk-clotting serine protease from Ficus religiosa . Nutrient Chemistry. 2012;131 (iv):1295-1303 - 49.
Suryati South et al. Construction elucidation of antibacterial compound from Ficus deltoidea Jack leaves. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry. 2011;11 (one):67-seventy - fifty.
Van Kiem P et al. Antioxidant activity of a new C-glycosylflavone from the leaves of Ficus microcarpa . Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2011;21 (2):633-637 - 51.
Shi Y-10 et al. Preliminary assessment of antioxidant activity of young edible leaves of vii Ficus species in the ethnic diet in Xishuangbanna, Southwest Communist china. Food Chemistry. 2011;128 (four):889-894 - 52.
Çalişkan O, Polat AA. Phytochemical and antioxidant properties of selected fig ( Ficus carica Fifty.) accessions from the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Scientia Horticulturae. 2011;128 (4):473-478 - 53.
Meshram MS, Itankar P, Patil A. To study pharmacognostic, physicochemical and phytochemical study of stem bark of bauhinia purpurea linn. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2014; two :19-22 - 54.
Aris SRS et al. Phenolic content and antioxidant action of fruits of Ficus deltoidea var angustifolia sp. The Malaysian Journal of Belittling Sciences. 2009;xiii (2):146-150 - 55.
Butera D et al. Antioxidant activities of Sicilian prickly pear ( Opuntia ficus-indica ) fruit extracts and reducing backdrop of its betalains: Betanin and indicaxanthin. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2002;50 (23):6895-6901 - 56.
Ayinde BA, Omogbai E, Amaechina FC. Pharmacognosy and hypotensive evaluation of Ficus exasperata Vahl (Moraceae ) leaf. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica. 2007;64 (half-dozen):543-546 - 57.
Rout Southward, Panda T, Mishra N. Ethno-medicinal plants used to cure dissimilar diseases by tribals of Mayurbhanj commune of Due north Orissa. Studies on Ethno-Medicine. 2009; three (ane):27-32 - 58.
Mazumder PM, Farswan Thousand, Parcha V. Hypoglycaemic issue of Ficus arnottiana Miq. bark extracts on streptozotocin induced diabetes in rats. Natural Product Radiance. 2009;eight (5):478-482 - 59.
Singh D, Goel RK. Anticonvulsant effect of Ficus religiosa : Office of serotonergic pathways. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2009;123 (two):330-334 - 60.
Ahmed F, Urooj A. Traditional uses, medicinal backdrop, and phytopharmacology of Ficus racemosa : A review. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2010;48 (6):672-681 - 61.
Manian R et al. The antioxidant activity and gratuitous radical scavenging potential of two different solvent extracts of Camellia sinensis (Fifty.) O. Kuntz,Ficus benghalensis L. andFicus racemosa L. Food Chemistry. 2008;107 (three):1000-1007 - 62.
Zhong 10-K et al. Chemic analysis and antioxidant activities in vitro of polysaccharide extracted from Opuntia ficus-indica Manufacturing plant. cultivated in China. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2010;82 (3):722-727 - 63.
Saini R, Garg V, Dangwal Thousand. Comparative study of three wild edible fruits of Uttrakhand for antioxidant, antiproliferative activities and polyphenolic limerick. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences. 2012; iii (4):158-167 - 64.
Alqasoumi SI et al. Phytochemical and pharmacological report of Ficus palmata growing in Kingdom of saudi arabia. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2014;22 (5):460-471 - 65.
Abdel-Hameed E-SS. Total phenolic contents and costless radical scavenging activeness of certain Egyptian Ficus species leaf samples. Food Chemical science. 2009;114 (four):1271-1277 - 66.
Gupta VK, Sharma SK. In vitro antioxidant activities of aqueous extract of Ficus benghalensis Linn. root. International Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010;4 (3):134-140 - 67.
Gaire BP et al. Phytochemical screening and analysis of antibacterial and antioxidant activity of Ficus auriculata (Lour.) stem bark. Pharmacognosy Journal. 2011;iii (21):49-55 - 68.
Olaokun OO et al. Evaluation of the inhibition of carbohydrate hydrolysing enzymes, antioxidant activity and polyphenolic content of extracts of ten African Ficus species (Moraceae ) used traditionally to treat diabetes. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2013;13 (1):94 - 69.
Konyalιoğlu Southward, Sağlam H, Kιvçak B. α-Tocopherol, flavonoid, and phenol contents and antioxidant activeness of Ficus carica . leaves. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2005;43 (viii):683-686 - 70.
Piluzza G, Bullitta Due south. Correlations between phenolic content and antioxidant properties in twenty-four plant species of traditional ethnoveterinary utilise in the Mediterranean surface area. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2011; 49 (iii):240-247 - 71.
Awad NE et al. Phytochemical and in vitro screening of some Ficus andMorus spp. for hypolipidaemic and antioxidant activities and in vivo assessment ofFicus mysorensis (Roth). Natural Product Research. 2012;26 (12):1101-1111 - 72.
Channabasavaraj KP, Badami S, Bhojraj Southward. Hepatoprotective and antioxidant activity of methanol excerpt of Ficus glomerata . Periodical of Natural Medicines. 2008;62 (three):379-383 - 73.
Leong CNA et al. Antioxidant flavonoid glycosides from the leaves of Ficus pumila L. Nutrient Chemical science. 2008;109 (ii):415-420 - 74.
Saloufou KI et al. Chemic limerick and antioxidant activities of different parts of Ficus sur. Periodical of Herbmed Pharmacology. 2018;7 (iii):185-192 - 75.
Sultana B, Anwar F, Ashraf Thou. Effect of extraction solvent/technique on the antioxidant activity of selected medicinal plant extracts. Molecules. 2009; 14 (6):2167-2180 - 76.
Misbah H, Aziz AA, Aminudin N. Antidiabetic and antioxidant backdrop of Ficus deltoidea fruit extracts and fractions. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2013;13 (one):118 - 77.
Khan Northward, Sultana Southward. Modulatory effect of Ficus racemosa : Diminution of potassium bromate-induced renal oxidative injury and cell proliferation response. Bones & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology. 2005;97 (5):282-288 - 78.
Kirana H, Agrawal South, Srinivasan B. Aqueous extract of Ficus religiosa Linn. reduces oxidative stress in experimentally induced type 2 diabetic rats. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology. 2009;47 :822-826 - 79.
Iqbal Z et al. In vitro anthelmintic activity of Allium sativum ,Zingiber officinale ,Curcurbita mexicana andFicus religiosa . International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 2001;three (4):454-457 - 80.
Geetha B, Mathew B, Augusti Chiliad. Hypoglycemic furnishings of leucodelphinidin derivative isolated from Ficus benghalensis (Linn.). Indian Periodical of Physiology and Pharmacology. 1994;38 :220-220 - 81.
Sharma S et al. Evaluation of the phytochemicals and antidiabetic activity of Ficus benghalensis . International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries. 2007;27 (two):56-59 - 82.
Patil V, Pimprikar R. Pharmacognostical studies and evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of Ficus benghalensis Linn. Journal of Young Pharmacists. 2009;1 (1):49 - 83.
Sivaraman D, Muralidharan P. Anti-ulcerogenic evaluation of root extract of Ficus hispida Linn. in aspirin ulcerated rats. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2010;4 (two):079-082 - 84.
Rao CV et al. Gastroprotective outcome of standardized extract of Ficus glomerata fruit on experimental gastric ulcers in rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2008;115 (2):323-326 - 85.
Ayisi NK, Nyadedzor C. Comparative in vitro furnishings of AZT and extracts of Ocimum gratissimum ,Ficus polita ,Clausena anisata ,Alchornea cordifolia , andElaeophorbia drupifera against HIV-i and HIV-2 infections. Antiviral Research. 2003;58 (1):25-33 - 86.
Gbeassor M et al. In vitro antimalarial activeness of half-dozen medicinal plants. Phytotherapy Enquiry. 1990; four (three):115-117 - 87.
Tkachenko H et al. In vitro antimicrobial activity of ethanolic extracts obtained from Ficus spp. leaves against the fish pathogenAeromonas hydrophila . Archives of Shine Fisheries. 2016;24 (4):219-230 - 88.
Fazili A et al. Nutritional status of school historic period children (5-fourteen years) in a rural health block of Northward India (Kashmir) using WHO Z-score system. Online Journal of Health and Allied Science. 2012; xi (2):1-iii - 89.
Kamazeri TSAT et al. Antimicrobial activity and essential oils of Curcuma aeruginosa ,Curcuma mangga , andZingiber cassumunar from Malaysia. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2012;5 (3):202-209 - 90.
Oyelana O et al. Antimicrobial activity of Ficus leaf extracts on some fungal and bacterial pathogens ofDioscorea rotundata from Southwest Nigeria. Journal of Biological Sciences. 2011;11 (5):359-366
Submitted: January 14th, 2019 Reviewed: April 26th, 2019 Published: November 27th, 2019
© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in whatever medium, provided the original piece of work is properly cited.
Source: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/67329
0 Response to "7 Phytochemical and Pharmacological Accounts of Some Reviewed Plants With Antidiabetic Potential"
Post a Comment